Death is different: premature execution warrants deny due process

The Death Penalty Information Center has reported that death-sen­tenced pris­on­ers in Louisiana recent­ly argued that the state issued exe­cu­tion war­rants before they had exhaust­ed their appeals, and the state high court agreed to recall the war­rants. 

In a recent article, it is reported that when a state pur­sues exe­cu­tions before pris­on­ers receive the full mea­sure of due process to which they are enti­tled, the fair­ness, accu­ra­cy, con­sis­ten­cy, and trans­paren­cy of the death penal­ty are called into ques­tion — imper­a­tives that the appeal process is intend­ed to ensure. 

As such, the Supreme Court recalled death warrants for Darrell Draughn and Marcus Reed, agree­ing with the two men that a judge must con­sid­er their state post-con­vic­tion claims before set­ting exe­cu­tion dates.

The United States Supreme Court has held that death is different, because that sentence, once imposed cannot be rectified.

You can read the full article here.


Previous
Previous

Prosecutorial misconduct: a feature in death penalty trials

Next
Next

Jimmie Duncan: Death sentence and conviction set aside due to inaccurate evidence